{"model": "openai/gpt-oss-120b", "provider": "Groq API (free tier)", "task": "rubric", "prompt": "Create a 4-level analytic rubric (Exceeds, Meets, Approaching, Beginning) for a high school CTE capstone project where students build a product and present it. Include 5 criteria: technical skill, safety practices, planning/documentation, presentation, and professionalism. Format as a table with specific, observable descriptors for each cell and total points.", "system": "You are helping a high school career and technical education (CTE) teacher. Produce classroom-ready material.", "temperature": 0.3, "ran_at": "2026-10-16T05:21:12-0700", "output": "## High\u2011School CTE Capstone Project Rubric \n*Product Build & Presentation* \n\n| **Criteria** | **Exceeds (4 pts)** | **Meets (3 pts)** | **Approaching (2 pts)** | **Beginning (1 pt)** |\n|--------------|--------------------|-------------------|--------------------------|----------------------|\n| **Technical Skill** | \u2022 Product functions flawlessly and exceeds design specifications.
\u2022 Uses advanced techniques/materials with precision.
\u2022 Shows creative problem\u2011solving that improves the final outcome. | \u2022 Product works as intended and meets all required specifications.
\u2022 Uses appropriate techniques and tools with consistent accuracy.
\u2022 Solves problems when they arise, but solutions are conventional. | \u2022 Product mostly works but has minor functional issues or does not fully meet specs.
\u2022 Uses basic techniques; occasional inaccuracies or rough edges.
\u2022 Attempts problem\u2011solving, but solutions are incomplete or only partially effective. | \u2022 Product does not function or fails to meet most specifications.
\u2022 Uses incorrect or unsafe techniques; many inaccuracies.
\u2022 Little or no evidence of problem\u2011solving. |\n| **Safety Practices** | \u2022 Consistently follows all safety protocols; anticipates hazards and implements preventive measures.
\u2022 Uses PPE correctly at all times; keeps work area clean and organized.
\u2022 Actively reminds peers of safety rules. | \u2022 Follows required safety rules and uses PPE correctly.
\u2022 Work area is generally tidy; hazards are identified and addressed. | \u2022 Occasionally forgets or misuses PPE; minor safety oversights.
\u2022 Work area is somewhat cluttered; some hazards are not fully mitigated. | \u2022 Frequently ignores safety rules; PPE is missing or used incorrectly.
\u2022 Work area is unsafe and disorganized; hazards are left unaddressed. |\n| **Planning & Documentation** | \u2022 Comprehensive, logical plan with detailed schematics, bill of materials, timeline, and risk analysis.
\u2022 Documentation is thorough, well\u2011organized, and includes reflections on each step. | \u2022 Clear plan that includes essential components (design sketch, materials list, timeline).
\u2022 Documentation records major steps and decisions. | \u2022 Basic plan present but missing several elements (e.g., timeline or risk analysis).
\u2022 Documentation is sparse, with limited detail or organization. | \u2022 Little or no planning evidence; missing key components.
\u2022 Documentation is incomplete, illegible, or absent. |\n| **Presentation** | \u2022 Engaging, polished presentation (15\u201120\u202fmin) that clearly explains problem, design process, technical details, and results.
\u2022 Uses high\u2011quality visuals, demos, and answers questions with depth. | \u2022 Clear presentation covering problem, design, build, and outcome.
\u2022 Visuals are adequate; answers most questions correctly. | \u2022 Presentation covers basics but lacks depth or clarity; visuals are minimal or hard to read.
\u2022 Struggles to answer questions or provides superficial answers. | \u2022 Presentation is disorganized, incomplete, or exceeds time limits.
\u2022 No visual aids; unable to answer questions. |\n| **Professionalism** | \u2022 Demonstrates leadership, collaboration, and accountability throughout the project.
\u2022 Meets all deadlines, communicates proactively, and reflects on personal growth. | \u2022 Works well with team, meets most deadlines, and communicates effectively.
\u2022 Shows responsibility for tasks. | \u2022 Inconsistent collaboration; occasional missed deadlines or delayed communication.
\u2022 Limited self\u2011reflection. | \u2022 Poor teamwork; frequent missed deadlines; little to no communication or accountability. |\n\n### Scoring Summary \n\n| Level | Points per Criterion | Total Points (max 20) |\n|-------|----------------------|-----------------------|\n| Exceeds | 4 | 20 |\n| Meets | 3 | 15 |\n| Approaching | 2 | 10 |\n| Beginning | 1 | 5 |\n\n**How to Use the Rubric**\n\n1. **Score each criterion** on a 4\u2011point scale (4\u202f=\u202fExceeds, 3\u202f=\u202fMeets, 2\u202f=\u202fApproaching, 1\u202f=\u202fBeginning). \n2. **Add the points** for the five criteria to get a final score out of 20. \n3. **Interpret the total:** \n * 18\u201120\u202fpts \u2013 Outstanding capstone performance \n * 13\u201117\u202fpts \u2013 Competent, meets expectations \n * 8\u201112\u202fpts \u2013 Developing; needs improvement in several areas \n * 5\u20117\u202fpts \u2013 Beginning; major gaps in skill, safety, or professionalism \n\nFeel free to adjust point weights (e.g., give more weight to Technical Skill or Safety) to align with your program\u2019s priorities. Good luck, and enjoy watching your students bring their ideas to life!", "finish_reason": "stop", "usage": {"queue_time": 0.143767249, "prompt_tokens": 167, "prompt_time": 0.007042503, "completion_tokens": 1172, "completion_time": 2.458869726, "total_tokens": 1339, "total_time": 2.465912229, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 159}}}