{"model": "claude-web", "provider": "Claude web app (claude.ai), signed in on a paid Max plan, Opus 5.5, default settings", "task": "rubric", "prompt": "Create a 4-level analytic rubric (Exceeds, Meets, Approaching, Beginning) for a high school CTE capstone project where students build a product and present it. Include 5 criteria: technical skill, safety practices, planning/documentation, presentation, and professionalism. Format as a table with specific, observable descriptors for each cell and total points.", "ran_at": "2026-10-17T13:27:03-0700", "output": "Claude Opus 5.5\n\nI'll build this as a shareable doc you can print or hand to students, with the full rubric table.\n\nOutline's up; now writing the overview.\n\nNow the main rubric table.\n\nLast, the score sheet and grade conversion.\n\n[CTE Capstone Project Rubric](https://claude.ai/code/artifact/419135f1-8de9-4caa-8a5e-7b208ed7b63e) is ready. Technical skill is weighted at 25 points, and I added a safety re-check rule. Edit those inline if you'd rather use equal weights, or comment and I'll revise.\n\n----- ARTIFACT CONTENT (Claude Docs: \"CTE Capstone Project Rubric\") -----\n\nCTE Capstone Project Rubric\nOct 17, 2026 \u00b7 @Leon\nHow scoring works\nThe rubric totals 100 points across 5 criteria, weighted toward the hands-on work. Score each criterion by choosing the level whose descriptor best matches the evidence, then pick a point value inside that level's range.\nCriterion\nWeight\nTechnical Skill\n25 pts\nSafety Practices\n20 pts\nPlanning & Documentation\n20 pts\nPresentation\n20 pts\nProfessionalism\n15 pts\nTotal\n100 pts\nSafety gate: a student scoring at Beginning in Safety Practices completes a safety re-check with the instructor before the project grade is finalized, regardless of total points.\nRubric\nCriterion\nExceeds\nMeets\nApproaching\nBeginning\nTechnical Skill (25 pts)\n23\u201325 pts. Product fully functions as designed and meets every spec; measurements and tolerances are within industry standard on first check. Selects and uses tools/equipment correctly without prompting. Adds at least one improvement beyond the requirements and explains why. Troubleshoots and fixes problems independently.\n19\u201322 pts. Product functions as designed and meets all required specs. Uses correct tools and techniques; may need one reminder. Workmanship is clean with minor cosmetic flaws only. Solves most problems independently, asking for help when appropriate.\n15\u201318 pts. Product works partially or meets most but not all specs (1\u20132 missed). Uses some tools or techniques incorrectly and needs repeated guidance. Visible quality issues (uneven finish, loose fits, rework needed). Relies on the instructor to diagnose problems.\n0\u201314 pts. Product is incomplete or does not function. Misses 3 or more specs. Frequently uses wrong tools or techniques. Work requires major redo. Cannot identify or solve problems even with support.\nSafety Practices (20 pts)\n18\u201320 pts. Wears all required PPE at every observation without reminders. Inspects tools/equipment before use and reports defects. Keeps work area clean and hazard-free throughout. Models safe behavior and corrects peers' unsafe actions respectfully. Zero safety violations.\n15\u201317 pts. Wears required PPE consistently; at most one reminder. Follows all posted procedures and equipment guards. Cleans and returns tools at end of each session. No safety violations.\n12\u201314 pts. Needs 2\u20133 reminders about PPE or procedures. Work area becomes cluttered during work. Returns tools inconsistently. One minor violation corrected on the spot.\n0\u201311 pts. Needs frequent reminders (4+) or ignores PPE requirements. Bypasses procedures or guards. Leaves hazards in the work area. Any serious violation or removal from equipment. Triggers safety re-check.\nPlanning & Documentation (20 pts)\n18\u201320 pts. Submits a complete plan before building: sketch/drawing with dimensions, materials list with quantities and costs, and a step-by-step timeline. Keeps a dated log every work session, with photos and notes on changes and why. Final documentation is organized enough that another student could reproduce the product.\n15\u201317 pts. Submits a plan with drawing, materials list, and timeline; minor details missing. Log entries cover nearly all sessions (misses no more than 2). Records major changes. Final documentation is complete and readable.\n12\u201314 pts. Plan is missing one major part (e.g., no dimensions or no materials list) or is turned in after building starts. Log has gaps of 3+ sessions or entries are vague (\"worked on project\"). Changes are not explained.\n0\u201311 pts. No plan, or plan created after the product was finished. Log is missing or has only 1\u20132 entries. Documentation does not explain how the product was made.\nPresentation (20 pts)\n18\u201320 pts. Clearly explains the problem, design choices, build process, and results within the time limit. Demonstrates the product working live. Uses accurate industry vocabulary throughout. Visuals are clear and support each point. Answers audience questions confidently with specific evidence.\n15\u201317 pts. Explains purpose, process, and results within the time limit (\u00b11 minute). Shows the product and how it works. Uses correct vocabulary with few errors. Visuals are readable. Answers most questions accurately.\n12\u201314 pts. Covers some required parts but skips one (e.g., no reflection on results). Runs more than 2 minutes over or under. Reads mostly from notes or slides. Vocabulary is vague or misused. Struggles to answer questions.\n0\u201311 pts. Missing two or more required parts, or presentation is not given. Product is not shown. Reads entire script with little eye contact. Cannot answer basic questions about the project.\nProfessionalism (15 pts)\n14\u201315 pts. Meets every deadline. Arrives on time and ready to work every session. Dresses appropriately for the shop and the presentation. Seeks and applies feedback without prompting. Communicates respectfully with peers, instructor, and any guest evaluators.\n11\u201313 pts. Meets all major deadlines; at most one minor late item. Uses class time productively. Dresses appropriately. Accepts feedback and applies it. Communicates respectfully.\n9\u201310 pts. Misses 1\u20132 deadlines. Off task at times and needs redirection. Accepts feedback but applies it inconsistently. Occasional unprofessional language or behavior.\n0\u20138 pts. Misses 3 or more deadlines. Frequently off task. Dismisses or ignores feedback. Disrespectful communication or attire inappropriate for the setting.\nScore sheet\nStudent: ____________________   Project: ____________________   Date: __________\nCriterion\nLevel\nPoints earned\nPossible\nEvidence / comments\nTechnical Skill\n\n\n25\n\nSafety Practices\n\n\n20\n\nPlanning & Documentation\n\n\n20\n\nPresentation\n\n\n20\n\nProfessionalism\n\n\n15\n\nTotal\n\n\n100\n\nTotal points\nOverall level\nLetter grade\n90\u2013100\nExceeds\nA\n75\u201389\nMeets\nB\u2013C\n60\u201374\nApproaching\nD\n0\u201359\nBeginning\nF (revise and resubmit)\nAdjust the letter-grade bands to match your district's grading scale.\n", "capture_note": "Claude's chat reply, then the Claude Docs document text as copied (tables copy as one cell per line; document links copy as plain text)"}